"Facts are stubborn things..." John Adams  

Resources
 

Home

Cell Phones

Study on Cell Phones and Cancer
American Journal of Epidemiology
12-07

Stevens Johnson Syndrome
Government Links on Ibuprofen
and NSAIDS Information

Bankruptcy

President Signs Bankruptcy Reform

Public Law 109-8 (PDF)

House Passes
Bankruptcy Reform

Class Action

Class Action Fairness
Act of 2005
(S.5) Bill Summary

Class Action Fairness
Act of 2005 (S.5) (OMB)

FDA

Medtronics


Bextra

Vioxx

Recalls 10-10-07

Asbestos / Mesothelioma

Mesothelioma Fact Sheet

The Basis of Mesothelioma Lawsuits

National Security

Homeland Security

Report a Terror
Threat Hotline:877-284-7328

National Infrastructure
Protection Center (NIPC)

FBI Tips and Public Leads

Legislative Branch

The U.S. Senate
Government Printing Office (GPO)
Library of Congress (LOC)
The Architect of the Capitol
The General Accounting Office
Center for Legislative Archives,
National Archives and Records Administration

Executive Branch

The White House
The President's Cabinet (Federal Agencies)
 Independent Federal Agencies and Commissions
CIA World Fact Book

Judicial Branch

U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Courts Links
1st Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
U.S. Court of International Trade
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Tax Court
U.S. Sentencing Commission
US Courts
The Federal Judicial Center (FJC)
Federal Judicial Center
House Judiciary Cmte.
Senate Judiciary Cmte.
Solicitor General
U.S. Courts Links
U.S. Department of Justice
National Center for State Courts
Chief Justice Federal Judiciary Year-End Reports
The Federal Judicial Center (FJC)

Legal Directories

Internet Lawyer Directory

State/Local Governments

Links to State/Local Governments

Official Documents

Early Congressional Documents
The Declaration of Independence
The Federalist Papers
The Constitution of the United States
 

 

S. 5 - Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
(Sen. Grassley (R) Iowa and 29 cosponsors)

 

 STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY

Source: Office of Management and Budget - 2-7-05  (House)

The Administration strongly supports the enactment of S. 5 as an important step in reforming class action litigation. The bill will remove significant burdens on class action litigants and provide greater protections for the victims whom the class action device originally was designed to benefit. Reducing the excessive burden of class action lawsuits on job creation is part of the President's plan to strengthen our economy further.

The Administration strongly supports the bill's proposal to establish a consumer class action bill of rights that would require heightened judicial review of settlements that either result in a net loss to the class members or give class members only coupons. The Administration also supports the provision prohibiting a court from approving a settlement that discriminates among plaintiffs on account of their geographical location.

The bill also would make long-needed changes to the requirements for Federal diversity jurisdiction over class action cases. The Administration strongly supports the proposal to permit, in certain cases, removal of a class action to Federal court if the aggregate amount in controversy exceeds $5 million and there is minimal diversity (at least one claimant and one defendant are from different States). The Administration also strongly supports the bill's coverage of "mass actions" in its diversity jurisdiction and removal reform sections. Like class actions, mass actions can be used to adjudicate substantial numbers of claims simultaneously in a single trial. Failure to include mass actions would create a significant loophole and would undermine the purpose of this legislation. Combined with existing Federal rules for consolidation of related Federal cases, this proposal would help avoid the inefficiency, waste, and unfairness that have too often resulted from multiple overlapping class action suits.

S. 5, as reported out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, reflects a carefully negotiated bi-partisan compromise. The Administration opposes any amendments that would have the effect of imperiling swift passage of this bill.


 

 


 

 

Google
 

Home | Disclaimer  | Contact  | About Us | Suggest a Story | Add URL

 

Copyright ©2008 Legal-News.Info