|
S. 5 - Class Action Fairness Act of
2005
(Sen. Grassley (R) Iowa and 29 cosponsors)
STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY
Source: Office of Management and Budget - 2-7-05 (House)
The Administration strongly supports the enactment of S. 5 as an
important step in reforming class action litigation. The bill will remove
significant burdens on class action litigants and provide greater
protections for the victims whom the class action device originally was
designed to benefit. Reducing the excessive burden of class action
lawsuits on job creation is part of the President's plan to strengthen our
economy further.
The Administration strongly supports the bill's proposal to establish a
consumer class action bill of rights that would require heightened
judicial review of settlements that either result in a net loss to the
class members or give class members only coupons. The Administration also
supports the provision prohibiting a court from approving a settlement
that discriminates among plaintiffs on account of their geographical
location.
The bill also would make long-needed changes to the requirements for
Federal diversity jurisdiction over class action cases. The Administration
strongly supports the proposal to permit, in certain cases, removal of a
class action to Federal court if the aggregate amount in controversy
exceeds $5 million and there is minimal diversity (at least one claimant
and one defendant are from different States). The Administration also
strongly supports the bill's coverage of "mass actions" in its diversity
jurisdiction and removal reform sections. Like class actions, mass actions
can be used to adjudicate substantial numbers of claims simultaneously in
a single trial. Failure to include mass actions would create a significant
loophole and would undermine the purpose of this legislation. Combined
with existing Federal rules for consolidation of related Federal cases,
this proposal would help avoid the inefficiency, waste, and unfairness
that have too often resulted from multiple overlapping class action suits.
S. 5, as reported out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, reflects a
carefully negotiated bi-partisan compromise. The Administration opposes
any amendments that would have the effect of imperiling swift passage of
this bill.
|